Error
  • Error loading feed data.
Home Analysis Health Care
Health Care


Of 21 wavering Democrats, Pelosi needs 18 to secure victory on health care

E-mail Print PDF

On Sunday morning's news programs, Democrats from the House as well as Obama's administration have been boasting that they will have the votes to pass health care reform by week's end.  Rhodes News has completed an analysis and their whip count strategy.

The House landscape has changed a bit since November's House vote. The Democrats hold four less seats than they did in November.  Rep. Eric Massa (D-NY) resigned, and Rep Jack Murtha (D-PA) passed away.  Neil Ambercromie (D-HI) resigned to run for governor, and Robert Wexler (D-FL) resigned to move to the private sector.  Of these four, only one, Massa, voted against the bill, so that's a net loss of three votes.

The lone Republican to vote for the ObamaCare bill in November, Joseph Cao (R-LA) has announced his intention to vote against the Senate version this time around.  If all other votes hold constant then Pelosi's whip count is 216, the exact number she needs for majority.

Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) voted against the bill in November, only because the legislation was not liberal enough for his taste, lacking a "government option."  Kucinich announced his "yes" vote Wednesday.  That brings the count up to 217.

Further, three representatives, all Democrats, have announced their retirement for the upcoming election.  They are: Brian Baird (D-WA), Bart Gordon (D-TN), John Tanner (D-TN).  Baird voted to "yes" in November and is not expected to change his vote. Gordon and Tanner voted against it, but now that they have announced their retirement, we must assume they will change their vote to support ObamaCare, since they will not have to face their constituents in an election in November.  It will be easier for them to simply go along with leadership arm-twisting than it will be for them to buck the brutal threats of the Beltway leadership.  That brings the whip count up to 219 for the Democrats.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 10:42
 

A conflict of visions over health care

E-mail Print PDF

In the aftermath of the health care reform summit, it is obvious the two sides are at an impasse, and differences across the isle will never be resolved.  Essentially congressional Republicans said, "Let's just pass what we can all agree upon."  The Democrats claim, "We cannot take an incremental approach.  All the problems are integrated. We have to do everything all at once."

FULL STORY

Last Updated on Thursday, 04 March 2010 02:49
 

Hate the Rich? You'll Loathe the Health Care Plan

E-mail Print PDF

Those big evil insurance companies.   President Obama has pulled off a brilliant coup.  He has demonized the insurance companies in public while cutting a back room deal.

The health care plan mandates that everyone must purchase insurance.  A $4 billion tax (excuse me, 'fee') on the entire Insurance industry?  We'll gladly pay it!  We're getting a huge market of young, healthy people who don't need insurance and they will be subsidizing the premiums for the elderly (who tend to be the richest among us).

What does "Medicaid estate Planning" mean?  The rich are hiding their assets to become eligible for Medicaid.  Appalling, right?

Last Updated on Monday, 30 November 2009 21:44
 

"Back Door" Delivering Free Health Care to Illegals is Already Built

E-mail Print PDF

Judge Andrew Napolitano argues that court precedent already protect illegal aliens to receive any health care benefits our lawmakers might bestow to us in the future.

Last Updated on Monday, 30 November 2009 21:45
 

Washington Post: Under Government Health Care, Rationing is Inevitable

E-mail Print PDF

The question, they say, is not whether there will be rationing, but rather what will be rationed, and when and how.

 

Last Updated on Monday, 30 November 2009 21:45
 


Like It? Share It!

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend
Follow Rhodes News on Twitter